Todd's thoughts/ideas
As I go through life, I see things that seem obvious to me, or that I think should and can, in a creative way, be fixed. This is one place where I hope to start noting them.
In the format of:
OK? Let's begin.
How can more people become employed?
Perhaps one way of getting more people involved is to find some out-of-work executives (if in fact they are really needed, which I really doubt in many instances)
and get some out-of-work workers together, find what skills they can contribute, and start some strong small companies
to give some people some pride of "working" while they look for long-term paying employment.
Teachers may be needed for retraining, and I think it would benefit many companies to hire great customer service representatives for their companies.
One notion that half the country seems to be lacking is pride (the other half is at "war" with terrorism and Saddam Hussein). We should, and still can, take pride in what we do well, whether or not a "boss" keeps us under contract for the forseeable future. Maybe I'm just naive.
What can the 2nd place person get, in the winner-take-all system?
I'm still looking for the answer to that.
Security involves 2 concepts, which both need to be in place. The first is physical security, meaning that someone physically can't do damage. Barackades and locks are an example.
Second is prevention, meaning winning the hearts and minds of others so they don't want to do damage. I don't know of any examples.
We're not neccessarily safe from physical threats if there hasn't been an attempt.
Just becuase someone has not physically caused damage because they don't want to, doesn't mean we're secure.
Also, we should be acting as the best of us to advertise ourselves as good so other's wont want to harm us. But that does not mean not physically securing us.
We should be doing tons of outreach to show how good we are.
How about U.S. liberals (so despised in our own country) taking their case of the good side of the US around the world?
I agree that Iraqi's should be able to decide on their own future. That includes some of them not wanting to give each other power. We need to prepare for that possiblity. What if some people don't want to do what we want them to do, yet we want all to be equal and democratic/one person one vote?
I realize that we have thankfully left the idea of "penitent"iary behind (or at least I hope we have) , but the concept of "guilt"y or "innocen[t]/innocence", IMHO smacks too much of Bible action influencing the justice system. The question (I think) ought to be "Did you do it? If so, what should your punishment be / how can we make the world whole again (fine, some Bible here).
Someone ought to rename health INSURANCE health ____. There should be a difference between health INSURANCE, as in car INSURANCE where you endless amounts in and only (try to) retrieve money when there has been an incident(. You normally don't expect your insurance to pay for your gas or oil changes.), and what seems something like national health CARE, which someone pays on an ongoing basis, and expects someone else to pay a larger amount of money on a ongoing basis.
That would reduce the price of "catastrophic" health insurance which we ALL still need, and would set realistic prices for "non-catastrophic" health care.
Of course one payee into the health care system would probably be the companies that are polluting the environment and overtaxing the workers which is causing the health care problems and would also tell the companies and their shareholders the proper cost of doing their business.